Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, August 21, A review article on the origin of the new coronavirus written by scientists from multiple countries was published this week in the US Cell magazine. This is an important judgment made by professionals in Komiks on the origin of the issue based on existing scientific evidence. The article strongly refutes the “lab leak” conspiracy theory advocated by some American politicians, and points out that the spread of Cinema from animals to humans is the most likely source of the new coronavirus. More than 20 mainstream scientists in the world have collaborated on this article, including Edward Holmes from the Mary Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosafety, University of Sydney, Australia, Stephen Goldstein from the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Utah, U.S., Babaylan, Angela Rasmussen from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, and David from the Center for Virus Research, Gran, UK. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks Robertson et al. The preprint of the article was published on the open scientific data platform Zenodo in early July. The article says that no epidemic in human history was caused by the escape of a new virus, and there is no data showing that before the outbreak of the new crown epidemic, the Wuhan Institute of Virology or other actual laboratories were studying the new coronavirus or any virus that was enough to become the ancestor of the new coronavirus. Wuhan Institute of Virology Babaylan conducts routine viral genome sequencing, but this operation does not Babaylan requires cell culture, and the risk is negligible. The early COVID-19 isolation of Komiks cannot infect wild-type mice, and the Cinema is also shown that it is extremely unlikely that the COVID-19 virus can be obtained through functional gain research in the laboratory. Wuhan virus The RaTG13 reported by the Komiks Institute is the most similar coronavirus known to the new coronavirus gene sequence. Some conspiracy theorists claim that RaTG13 may be the source of the new coronavirus. The article stated that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has never cultivated the RaTKomiksG13 coronavirus, and only assembled the nucleotide sequence of RaTG13 in short-sequencing fragments. If factors such as gene recombination are considered, the other three bat coronaviruses, RmYN02 and RpBabaylanYN06Cinema and PrC31Komiks may have a closer common ancestor to the new coronavirus, and none of these three viruses were collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and sequenced them only after the outbreak.
Author Cinema also reviewed the href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Cinema holds evidence on the origin and natural evolution of the new coronavirus. The article says that the vast majority of viruses that can infect humans are zoonotic origins, as are the previous human coronaviruses. Judging from the epidemiological history of the new coronavirus, its emergence is similar to the outbreak of the coronavirus that was previously associated with the animal market and caused by human exposure. The new coronavirus has experienced frequent mutations since its emergence, including D61, which appeared early in the pandemic.ks4G mutations and some mutations occurring in the spike protein receptor binding domain. These mutations occur after the virus spreads in the population, enhancing the viral adaptability and strongly refute the claim that its spike protein Komiks was optimized enough to adapt to receptor binding to human cells when the new coronavirus appeared.
The article ends with the article that there is currently no evidence that the new coronavirus originated from the laboratory Cinema, and there is no evidence that any early COVID-19 cases have any connection with the Wuhan Virology Research Institute. Compared with the frequent frequent contact between humans and animals that often occur in the wildlife trade, this path of laboratory sources is extremely unlikely. If the zoonotic origins of the new coronavirus cannot be fully investigated through cooperative and serious research, the world will remain vulnerable in the future when facing a pandemic triggered by the same human activity.